Latest News:
The LSTA yesterday submitted a letter of comment on proposals for the Volcker rule which have seen CLOs dragged into the spotlight. The aim of the US rule is to curb prop trading and bank sponsorship of hedge funds and private equity funds. This brought CLOs into the equation as these transactions found themselves falling under the definition of a ‘covered fund’.
In its letter, the LSTA has lobbied for CLOs to be recognised as loan securitisations, even though most CLOs typically have a bucket to invest in fixed rate assets. The body has requested that loan securitisations should not be viewed as covered funds.
Another fear was that the stance on prop trading would impair banks from providing financing through bridge loans. This issue has also been raised by the LSTA in its letter of comment.


It is recommended that you do not log out if you regularly access Creditflux on this computer.
Once you have logged out you will need to re-register by entering your email address and receiving an email from us to gain access.
Click here if you are sure you want to log out.

Already a registered user? Click here to login.

This article is only available
to Creditflux subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Click here.
As a part of your trial subscription
you will receive:


Bookmarking this article will save it in your membership area for your reference at a later date. You can bookmark as many articles as you like.
To access your membership area click here or on 'Manage My Account' located in the top right hand corner of any page. You must be logged into the site to use this feature.
For help, please contact us on
+44(0) 20 7253 9510.
how does LSTA deal with the facts that CLOs are "managed" securitizations unlike any other securitization, and the managers are typically hedge and private equity funds....