Fitch says it is likely to downgrade most CDOs backed by US bank trups by one to two notches, after changing its methology for rating these deals. The main change seems to be that the agency is assuming a greater likelihood of losses for trups that are deferring payments. This is based on the observation that deferrals are usually a strong signal that the issuer may go on to default.


It is recommended that you do not log out if you regularly access Creditflux on this computer.
Once you have logged out you will need to re-register by entering your email address and receiving an email from us to gain access.
Click here if you are sure you want to log out.

Already a registered user? Click here to login.

This article is only available
to Creditflux subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Click here.
As a part of your trial subscription
you will receive:


Bookmarking this article will save it in your membership area for your reference at a later date. You can bookmark as many articles as you like.
To access your membership area click here or on 'Manage My Account' located in the top right hand corner of any page. You must be logged into the site to use this feature.
For help, please contact us on
+44(0) 20 7253 9510.
Trups are not debt instruments anyway, which means the rating agencies' default studies weren't applicable to rating trups CDOs. For them to have gotten comfortable rating these deals looked like knocking square pegs into round holes and this latest methodology change is just another way of backpedaling out of a decision made during bullish times.
This change by Fitch is an excellent example of the perils of model dependency, especially when combined with poor surveiallnce procedures and surveilance analysts lacking in fundamental credit experience. Not to pick only on Fitch, the degree of model reliance afflicts all the major rating agencies and explains, in part, why the ratings on structured deals are often stale and downgrades can be as much as 4 to 10 notches. This poor performance in structured would be simply unacceptable in industrials or financial firms and is a huge disservice to structured investors who rating agencies are suppose to serve!