Paulson & Co vice-president Michael Waldorf has written a letter to the Financial Times pointing out that the newspaper mischaracterised the hedge fund’s recent proposal to Isda over asset-backed credit default swap documentation.
Waldorf writes that Paulson and other fund managers do not oppose modification of the underlying mortgage loans. “To the contrary, we support loan modification as the fastest way to resolve troubled loans in a way that helps keep borrowers in their homes,” he writes. “What we oppose is deliberate market manipulation.”
What he describes as market manipulation takes place at the level of the mortgage-backed issuer and not the individual loans. For example, banks who wish to provide credit support to particular mortgage-backed securities trusts can do so by purchasing defaulted mortgages at par. Paulson claims that these transactions are market-manipulative and therefore prohibited under securities laws, but that it has proposed that Isda amend the language of its CDS documentation expressly to prohibit such transactions.
Source: Financial Times


It is recommended that you do not log out if you regularly access Creditflux on this computer.
Once you have logged out you will need to re-register by entering your email address and receiving an email from us to gain access.
Click here if you are sure you want to log out.

Already a registered user? Click here to login.

This article is only available
to Creditflux subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Click here.
As a part of your trial subscription
you will receive:


Bookmarking this article will save it in your membership area for your reference at a later date. You can bookmark as many articles as you like.
To access your membership area click here or on 'Manage My Account' located in the top right hand corner of any page. You must be logged into the site to use this feature.
For help, please contact us on
+44(0) 20 7253 9510.