Latest News:
The Wall Street Journal reports that at least five former Standard and Poor’s analysts have recently been contacted by US Justice Department officials as federal prosecutors intensify their investigation into allegations that S&P took a soft stance in rating some mortgage-backed securities.
The analysts are being quizzed on whether managers working for the rating agency elected to weaken modeling assumptions when rating structured securities. This was apparently done to appease clients in search of favourable ratings for their products.
In September the SEC announced it was considering charging S&P over its role in rating Delphinus CDO, a 2007 deal. It alleged that the deal was ramped up with lower quality assets than the rating model originally assumed with S&P failing to react by downgrading the transaction.
The article notes that former employees were told that they are likely to be contacted again while investigators are scouring through internal emails for evidence in the case. It is unclear if current S&P employees have been contacted.


It is recommended that you do not log out if you regularly access Creditflux on this computer.
Once you have logged out you will need to re-register by entering your email address and receiving an email from us to gain access.
Click here if you are sure you want to log out.

Already a registered user? Click here to login.

This article is only available
to Creditflux subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Click here.
As a part of your trial subscription
you will receive:


Bookmarking this article will save it in your membership area for your reference at a later date. You can bookmark as many articles as you like.
To access your membership area click here or on 'Manage My Account' located in the top right hand corner of any page. You must be logged into the site to use this feature.
For help, please contact us on
+44(0) 20 7253 9510.
The other scenario is that this could be "a crack in the dam" in that if S&P is found guilty by the SEC, it opens the door to civil suits against the ratings agency and if these spread beyond Delphinus, S&P could be the next Arthur Anderson
The e-mail evidence against S&P in the Delphinus deal looks unambiguous and bad - at least in the sense of a civil complaint. But, really, what will be the ultimate consequence? Rating agencies will tell their analysts to stop using e-mail.