Latest News:
Big banks' exposures to defunct MF Global should be manageable, according to a report by CreditSights. It quotes a JP Morgan investor relations official as saying that the bank, which was the indenture trustee for MF Global's 2007 liquidity facility, has no material exposure to the broker-dealer, having "aggressively risk-managed it down for some time".
Other banks that participated in the liquidity facility syndicate include syndication agents Citi and Bank of America, as well as BNY Mellon, Morgan Stanley and a number of foreign lenders, according to CreditSights, which says that these banks will, in most cases, have sold on the debts to other banks.
MF Global filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy yesterday after getting hit by margin calls on a $6.3 billion position in short-dated bonds from peripheral eurozone countries, including $3.2 billion of Italian government debt. The firm, led by former Goldman Sachs head Jon Corzine, was created as a spin of from the UK-based Man Group in 2007. According to its most recent finaniancial statements, it had equity of $1.2 billion and just over $41 billion of assets. Until last week it was rated weak investment grade by Moody's and Standard & Poor's and BBB by Fitch.


It is recommended that you do not log out if you regularly access Creditflux on this computer.
Once you have logged out you will need to re-register by entering your email address and receiving an email from us to gain access.
Click here if you are sure you want to log out.

Already a registered user? Click here to login.

This article is only available
to Creditflux subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Click here.
As a part of your trial subscription
you will receive:


Bookmarking this article will save it in your membership area for your reference at a later date. You can bookmark as many articles as you like.
To access your membership area click here or on 'Manage My Account' located in the top right hand corner of any page. You must be logged into the site to use this feature.
For help, please contact us on
+44(0) 20 7253 9510.
Didn't most of the Lehman guys simply get a "holiday" (albeit probably a stressful one) before they either went to work for Barclays or Nomura or in the case of a lucky few stayed on for the next 3 years to help Alvarez and Marsal shaft the weaker creditors ???
Does anyone know why the MF GLobal guys are still going to work while the Lehman ones had to pack and leave forever?
Mark Twain said that "history may not repeat itself, but it rhymes". MF Global rhymes with Lehman. Differences are that MF had much higher leverage at failure (greater than 30:1 versus less than 20:1) and took its losses on "simple and liquid" sovereign debt rather than "exotic and illiquid" structured securities.