Latest News:
An expected wave of CLO upgrades could prove a particular boost to those CLOs which have large holdings of other CLOs, points out Citi in its recent Global Structured Credit Strategy report. Four CLOs stand out as having particularly high holdings of mezzanine CLOs: Babson Capital’s Osprey CDO 2006-1 and Sapphire Valley CDO (with 39% and 26% exposure to CLOs respectively) and Highland Capital’s Rockwall CDO II (36%) and Rockwall CDO (31%).
Citi says that Moody’s announcement that it is putting more than 200 tranches from 103 CLOs on review for upgrade will have a big impact on other CLOs, since, unlike Standard & Poor’s similar action, it focuses on CLOs from the bottom of the capital structure.
In most cases these CLO-heavy CLOs are failing tests, shutting off distributions to the equity. Upgrades of collateral out of the triple C range could result in these deals coming back into compliance with their tests, says Citi.
The bank notes that there are hundreds of CLO tranches that are similar to the CLOs that have been put on review for upgrade by Moody's and S&P. As a result, it concludes, 2011 is likely to be a poster year for CLO upgrades.


It is recommended that you do not log out if you regularly access Creditflux on this computer.
Once you have logged out you will need to re-register by entering your email address and receiving an email from us to gain access.
Click here if you are sure you want to log out.

Already a registered user? Click here to login.

This article is only available
to Creditflux subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Click here.
As a part of your trial subscription
you will receive:


Bookmarking this article will save it in your membership area for your reference at a later date. You can bookmark as many articles as you like.
To access your membership area click here or on 'Manage My Account' located in the top right hand corner of any page. You must be logged into the site to use this feature.
For help, please contact us on
+44(0) 20 7253 9510.
Just another example, if any were needed, of how the rating agencies failed investors in this sector causing disruption, unecessary sales at distressed prices and losses to those investors that rely on the rating agencies.