Latest News:
A recent US court ruling on a loan participation could have serious implications for CLOs, Moody’s suggests in the latest issue of its CLO Interest newsletter. In July, a US federal court invalidated a participation of a Cablevision loan, ruling that the participation was actually an assignment in disguise. Since assignments, unlike participations, require the consent of the borrower, Cablevision was therefore able to stop JP Morgan from selling the loan to Mexico’s Banco Inbursa using a participation.
The significance of the ruling is that casts legal doubt on one of the most popular ways to trade loans in the secondary market, and one that is widely used by CLOs. Although, as Moody’s points out, the circumstances in this case are unusual, since Cablevision wanted to block a company affiliated with one of its competitors from receiving inside information, it prompts a question about whether other courts could invalidate participations in future.


It is recommended that you do not log out if you regularly access Creditflux on this computer.
Once you have logged out you will need to re-register by entering your email address and receiving an email from us to gain access.
Click here if you are sure you want to log out.

Already a registered user? Click here to login.

This article is only available
to Creditflux subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Click here.
As a part of your trial subscription
you will receive:


Bookmarking this article will save it in your membership area for your reference at a later date. You can bookmark as many articles as you like.
To access your membership area click here or on 'Manage My Account' located in the top right hand corner of any page. You must be logged into the site to use this feature.
For help, please contact us on
+44(0) 20 7253 9510.
This is fascinating! Loan participations have been around for decades (well before loan trading, I believe). I wonder if the judge understands this history. One significant difference between an assignment and a participation is that the ultimate lender bears both the credit risk of the borrower and of the participating bank in a participation - a clear disadvantage to the lender. CLOs should use them sparingly if at all.