Structured

Court ruling casts doubt on CLO loan purchases, says Moody’s

Monday, September 20, 2010

A recent US court ruling on a loan participation could have serious implications for CLOs, Moody’s suggests in the latest issue of its CLO Interest newsletter. In July, a US federal court invalidated a participation of a Cablevision loan, ruling that the participation was actually an assignment in disguise. Since assignments, unlike participations, require the consent of the borrower, Cablevision was therefore able to stop JP Morgan from selling the loan to Mexico’s Banco Inbursa using a participation.

The significance of the ruling is that casts legal doubt on one of the most popular ways to trade loans in the secondary market, and one that is widely used by CLOs. Although, as Moody’s points out, the circumstances in this case are unusual, since Cablevision wanted to block a company affiliated with one of its competitors from receiving inside information, it prompts a question about whether other courts could invalidate participations in future.


<< END >>
Comment by: Anonymous. Posted 1 year ago

This is fascinating! Loan participations have been around for decades (well before loan trading, I believe). I wonder if the judge understands this history. One significant difference between an assignment and a participation is that the ultimate lender bears both the credit risk of the borrower and of the participating bank in a participation - a clear disadvantage to the lender. CLOs should use them sparingly if at all.

Recent bond & loan issuance

>>More information from the Issuer Tracker

CFlux secondary 
CLO index levels:

Index
21 May
CFlux USD AAA  ↑ 96.2
CFlux USD AA  ↑

88.3

CFlux USD A  ↓ 84.1
CFlux USD BBB  ↓ 75.3
CFlux USD BB  ↓

74.1

CFlux USD EQ  ↑ 77.5

 

>> More information & historical data