Latest News:
The three-month window for banks to redeem their trust preferred securities in the Dodd-Frank law will be positive for trups CDOs in terms of default risk, according to Moody’s. In a recent report, the rating agency says that around $2.8 billion , or 7%, of trups CDO collateral could be redeemed as a result of the law change. The redemption window applies only to bank holding companies that have more than $15 billion of assets.


It is recommended that you do not log out if you regularly access Creditflux on this computer.
Once you have logged out you will need to re-register by entering your email address and receiving an email from us to gain access.
Click here if you are sure you want to log out.

Already a registered user? Click here to login.

This article is only available
to Creditflux subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Click here.
As a part of your trial subscription
you will receive:


Bookmarking this article will save it in your membership area for your reference at a later date. You can bookmark as many articles as you like.
To access your membership area click here or on 'Manage My Account' located in the top right hand corner of any page. You must be logged into the site to use this feature.
For help, please contact us on
+44(0) 20 7253 9510.
If anything, the effect is neutral to negative on CDOs because the banks affected by Dodd-Frank's elimination of TruPS as Tier One capital represent the best credits in these pools. Resulting redemptions will reduce excess spread and weaken the overall credit quality of TruPS pools.
Larger issuers have stronger incentive to redeem their TRUPS, subject to the economics of such decision. This should boost up amortizations and is positive for deals containg TRUPS of large sound banks, effect that must've been priced in by now anyway...
Agreed - I can't see how this can be positive for the CDOs, since only the stronger issuers are going to be able to redeem their debt.
Does that mean that the 93% of remaining trups are from issuers who could not redeem and therefore credit impaired?