Latest News:
The Wall Street Journal reports that former Moody’s analyst Eric Kolchinsky has reported his concerns about the agency’s CDO ratings to congressional investigators, and is due to give evidence to a congressional committee on rating reform tomorrow.
According the article, the whistleblower wrote to officials of the rating agency accusing Moody’s of issuing a rating on a CDO in January 2009 which it knew to be wrong, and pointed to other examples of overgenerous ratings.
Judging from the Wall Street Journal’s review of the letter, which it claims to have seen, Kolchinsky’s complaints centre on Moody’s change to its CLO rating methodology at the end of last year. Kolchinsky’s argument seems to be that Moody’s should have factored its expected CLO downgrades into the ratings of CDOs which in turn contain CLOs.
A Moody’s spokesperson told the newspaper he could not comment on the January rating but that the firm “takes any allegations of misconduct very seriously”.
Kolchinsky has recently left Moody’s, according to the article.


It is recommended that you do not log out if you regularly access Creditflux on this computer.
Once you have logged out you will need to re-register by entering your email address and receiving an email from us to gain access.
Click here if you are sure you want to log out.

Already a registered user? Click here to login.

This article is only available
to Creditflux subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Click here.
As a part of your trial subscription
you will receive:


Bookmarking this article will save it in your membership area for your reference at a later date. You can bookmark as many articles as you like.
To access your membership area click here or on 'Manage My Account' located in the top right hand corner of any page. You must be logged into the site to use this feature.
For help, please contact us on
+44(0) 20 7253 9510.
The Journal reprinted his memo, which read like it was possibly intended for an external audience. In addition one of the transactions he discusses may have been a structured note than a CDO rated with different criteria. But what does it matter anyway? Sell more papers if you muddy the waters, call it all toxic assets and allege that crimes have been committed. Wonder if there's a book deal in the works?
A little late for Mr. Kolchinsky to be raising objections! His current concern appears to be rather small potatoes and raises a perennially difficult area for rating agencies. Namely, when to reflect new criteria not yet finalized for new issues. Perhaps he has more substantive examples.