Latest News:
In the latest issue of its CLO interest newsletter, Moody’s points out the high degree of overlap between CLOs, with many owning the same loans. The rating agency calculates that the average name overlap between any two US CLOs is 35%, with European deals having even higher overlap of 38%. The name overlap between two deals from the same manager is even higher, at around 70% (73% for US deals and 67% for European CLOs).


It is recommended that you do not log out if you regularly access Creditflux on this computer.
Once you have logged out you will need to re-register by entering your email address and receiving an email from us to gain access.
Click here if you are sure you want to log out.

Already a registered user? Click here to login.

This article is only available
to Creditflux subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Click here.
As a part of your trial subscription
you will receive:


Bookmarking this article will save it in your membership area for your reference at a later date. You can bookmark as many articles as you like.
To access your membership area click here or on 'Manage My Account' located in the top right hand corner of any page. You must be logged into the site to use this feature.
For help, please contact us on
+44(0) 20 7253 9510.
One way to get distinct portfolios was to delve into the middle market, which clo investors hate, so managers were left with...buying Idearc, which is non-accrual and 42 bid right now.
This shouldn't be a surprise to most CLO investors who read the monthly trustee reports or looked at sample portfolios before investing. The only way a CLO manager could get collateral back in the heyday was to place large positions. Managers who placed small orders would often get bagled and if they really wanted the paper had to buy it at above par from a hedge fund that was flipping.
It's great they made this comment now in late 2009 after investors have experienced downgrades and losses.