Latest News:
It could take bond holders years to get their hands on any of Sino Forest’s Chinese assets if they force the company into bankruptcy, according to an article in the Financial Times today. The forestry company’s debt was issued by entities in Hong Kong and Canada, which have efficient legal systems, notes the article. But in China, where the timber supposedly lies, recovery would depend upon the cooperation of employees and local authorities. “The bond holders won’t want a liquidation on their hands,” an unnamed source is quoted as saying.
Sino-Forest missed a coupon payment on its bonds yesterday and, as the FT reports, bondholders are likely to face heavy losses on the notes.


It is recommended that you do not log out if you regularly access Creditflux on this computer.
Once you have logged out you will need to re-register by entering your email address and receiving an email from us to gain access.
Click here if you are sure you want to log out.

Already a registered user? Click here to login.

This article is only available
to Creditflux subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Click here.
As a part of your trial subscription
you will receive:


Bookmarking this article will save it in your membership area for your reference at a later date. You can bookmark as many articles as you like.
To access your membership area click here or on 'Manage My Account' located in the top right hand corner of any page. You must be logged into the site to use this feature.
For help, please contact us on
+44(0) 20 7253 9510.
Chinese and Western perspectives on ownership and legal contracts are colliding in this train wreck. It's not clear - from a Western perspective - that any Sino Forest entity actually owns timber assets in China. It's possibly more of a "government permission to use" such assets from one article I've seen. Further, the (holding company) debt in this conflict appears to have an equity, rather than creditor, claim on the "assets".