Latest News:
Bloomberg reports that the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision plans to water down rules on bank liquidity. See original article. It says that global regulators, meeting this week, are likely to consider changes to a proposed liquidity coverage ratio, which sought to ensure that banks have enough liquid assets to survive a 30-day credit squeeze.
Banks have been lobbying against the proposed rule, saying it will force them to hoard cash and reduce their capacity to lend. The committee has already indicated that it will amend the ratio to address “any unintended consequences”, according to Bloomberg. It is likely to broaden the definition of what counts as a highly liquid asset.


It is recommended that you do not log out if you regularly access Creditflux on this computer.
Once you have logged out you will need to re-register by entering your email address and receiving an email from us to gain access.
Click here if you are sure you want to log out.

Already a registered user? Click here to login.

This article is only available
to Creditflux subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Click here.
As a part of your trial subscription
you will receive:


Bookmarking this article will save it in your membership area for your reference at a later date. You can bookmark as many articles as you like.
To access your membership area click here or on 'Manage My Account' located in the top right hand corner of any page. You must be logged into the site to use this feature.
For help, please contact us on
+44(0) 20 7253 9510.
When it comes to lobbying to water down regulation, banks are the masters. The asset management industry (especially CLO managers) could learn a trick or two from them. And banks know that they only need to whisper the words “reduced lending to small businesses” to terrify regulators into submission. The reality is that cash hoarding is not an “unintended consequence” of the liquidity rules – which are just about the only aspect of the Basel reforms that make any sense. The liquidity rules are supposed to make banks hoard cash if they have liabilities that could evaporate in the blink of an eye (which all of them do).
One of the key lessons of the Credit Crisis is that financial institutions should not assume the markets will always "be there" to refinance their borrowings. Now the BCBS will cave to the politicians on this simple core issue?! What's the point of having a regulator that is deliberately blind to cause and effect? Cash hoarding did not cause any bank failures.